In Mold (or Mould) Electronics (IME) promises to enable high-volume production of structural electronics where the electronic circuitry and functionality are part of the 3D-shaped structure itself. This will save weight and space and will enable new elegant designs.
IME is not exactly a new process or technology. In fact, in many ways, it is an evolution of the well-established IMD, or in mold decoration, in which molding (or other ways of 3D forming) are combined with graphic printing. The transition from IMD to IME however is not straight forward, especially on a commercial scale. Indeed, this partially explains why it has taken this long for IME to establish lasting commercial success despite all the efforts and false starts.
However, this is changing. Indeed, there are already low-volume IME products on the market and the transition towards higher volume application is not far off. Our report, In-Mold Electronics 2019-2029: Technology, Market Forecasts, Players, finds that the market will exceed $250M by 2024. This report provides a detailed assessment of the materials, processes, products and protypes, application and markets for IME and multiple rival technologies such as molded interconnect devices (MID) or aerosol deposition. Furthermore, this report provides application-segmented ten-year market forecasts and overviews of the key companies across this emerging value chain.
This article draws from the above-mentioned report to outline key innovation trends underpinning the commercialization of IME. Here, we will consider trends in materials, processes, as well as design. This will give the reader a better insight into this promising technology.
Everything must change to enable the commercialization of IME. New materials must be developed that can survive new requirements such as stretching and 3D forming; new processes must be developed to combine 2D printing, 3D forming and rigid component placement, and new design procedures and product concepts must be developed based on material and process characteristics as well as market needs. This extensive change at many levels has prolonged the go-to-market timelines.
Functional materials in IME must withstand new requirements. They must survive a one-off significant stretching event as the 2D printed sheet is formed into a 3D object. This is much more challenging to achieve for functional (vs mere graphical) inks since elongation can disrupt the function, e.g., break the conduction path in conductive inks.
There is no single required degree of stretching, however in general higher levels of stretchability are desired. As a crude rule of thumb, 20% elongation is the minimum whereas 60% or higher is in many cases preferred. Suppliers already seek to differentiate by the stretchability of the material since it eases process development and gives more design freedom.
Functional materials must also be reliable under harsh field conditions. This is critical particularly in automotive and similar applications. This aspect, surprisingly, was often neglected in the early days. Indeed, famous IME product failures and recalls have been caused by unreliability. The properties of utilized materials can often change significantly during high humidity and high temperature tests. This change should be factored into the design of the product.
IME is not composed of a single layer of materials. In fact, a stack of materials will need to be printed to achieve the required effect. This stack can include graphic inks, conductive inks, dielectrics, transparent conductive inks, carbon overcoats, and so on.
Thus far, the most studied functional material has been the conductive ink (to learn more about conductive inks visit www.IDTechEx.com/inks). Today, there are multiple suppliers across the world offering conductive inks for IME. This attention is justified because metal filled (almost always silver) conductive inks represent the most expensive and high value material in the stack and because they are the most sensitive to changes in the conduction, e.g., elongation.
Other materials are also critical in the process. In particular, low-temperature printable conductive adhesives that also exhibit some stretchability are these days subject of increased product offerings. In general, all functional materials must also be compatible with one another. This compatibility is critical especially during the forming process and significantly impacts final properties. Indeed, even the sequences in which the materials are deposited can have an impact. This is a development challenge but also an opportunity to develop and sell complete IME material portfolios.
The substrate also represents a development and supply opportunity. Most have thus far utilized a polycarbonate substrate due to its good formability however many are now developing alternative such as special PETs. This is a space to watch closely. The molding material will also be important especially if new material can be developed to relax the molding conditions. This would ease performance requirements for all the other materials in the process.
To learn more about material requirements, challenges, offerings and trends please visit our report In-Mold Electronics 2019-2029: Technology, Market Forecasts, Players. Here, you will learn about the latest developments and commercial activities.
Process trends and challenges
The process is critical. It is not straightforward. It involves printing and drying/curing multiple functional and graphical materials on a 2D formable substrate such as PC. It then involves converting the 2D sheet into the 3D shape via thermo or vacuum molding under elevated temperatures. The overmolding must then take place at high temperatures too. In many cases, it might be tempting to cut corners to streamline the process for mass production, but past experience suggests that this comes with significant perils.
The question of pick-and-placing rigid components is also challenging. If the pick-and-place takes place after forming, then the pick-and-place machine must be able to handle placement in a 3D space. This will require specialized pick-and-place as well as adhesive dispensing tools, and will almost certainly slow down the process. The pick-and-place could also take place on a 2D sheet prior to forming. This would however require special adhesives as well as careful product and process design to ensure that the rigid components will remain attached after all the forming steps.
In general, the process development is complex. It requires deep knowledge of the materials as well as all the process steps. The question of yield is a persistent and particular challenge. This is because defects cannot be repaired since electronics are embedded or structurally integrated. As such, defects are expensive since they waste the fully formed devices. In general, there is a steep learning curve to be travelled. This has created the need for centres or entities with accumulated know-how and expertise to cut down development time and technical barriers to entry. It has also meant that many traditional membrane switch or other functional printers with low risk appetites and/or tight cash flows have had to wait for the industry to mature further before investing to evolve their business towards IME. This evolution will increasingly become inevitable and will accelerate as IME achieves a higher level of technical maturity and perhaps modularity.
To learn more IME processes as well as multiple competing processes such as MID or aerosol refer to our report In-Mold Electronics 2019-2029: Technology, Market Forecasts, Players. Here, you will learn about the technical details, the development status and phases, the target markets, the merits of each approach, the main players and so on.
Design trends and challenges
The design of IME products is also not straight forward. This is because it requires deep knowledge of material and process characteristics. It is not a streamlined process yet, lacking established software packages with drop-and-place component/functional libraries. This is in stark contrast to design processes found, say, in standard PCBs. The market requirements are also not clear-cut, well-established or convergent yet. This is because despite years of development the industry is still in an exploratory phase where it is developing numerous prototypes and running qualification processes. The products and prototypes are still mainly custom made without standard design.
These all complicate the product development process, prolong the time-to-market, and form barriers to entry for users as well as potential producers. However, the industry is responding now and some firms are positioning to fill exactly this need, thus helping accelerate overall commercialization.
The themes briefly discussed in this article have certainly prolonged the time-to-market. Indeed, IME, despite its semblance of simplicity on paper, is a complex endeavour, requiring drastic changes in materials, processes, designs and product concepts. The industry however has come a long way in terms of its accumulated learning as well as product offering. Low volume products are already on the market and multiple high-volume applications are not too far from final qualification. Indeed, we forecast this market to exceed one billion dollars within the next decade. To learn more about the technical as well as commercial aspects of this emerging opportunity refer to In-Mold Electronics 2019-2029: Technology, Market Forecasts, Players.
Top image: Pixabay